明发彩票-明发彩票

来源：明发彩票2024-04-18 17:48

明发彩票

凝心聚力全面推进乡村振兴******

　　不久前，在第十九届中国国际农产品交易会上，160个乡村振兴重点帮扶县与30多家批发市场、采购商达成意向签约额50.8亿元。《乡村振兴责任制实施办法》印发，要求“五级书记抓乡村振兴”，推动更多社会力量投身乡村振兴一线。放眼广袤田畴，脱贫攻坚成果得到巩固拓展，一幅农业强、农村美、农民富的乡村振兴画卷徐徐展开。

　　强国必先强农，农强方能国强。习近平总书记在近日举行的中央农村工作会议上强调：“全面推进乡村振兴、加快建设农业强国，是党中央着眼全面建成社会主义现代化强国作出的战略部署。”在全面建设社会主义现代化国家开局起步的重要时刻，习近平总书记的重要讲话明确了当前和今后一个时期“三农”工作的目标任务、战略重点和主攻方向，为建设农业强国、加快推进农业农村现代化提供了遵循。

　　全面建设社会主义现代化国家，最艰巨最繁重的任务依然在农村，最广泛最深厚的基础依然在农村。推动实现农村更富裕、生活更幸福、乡村更美丽，必须采取更有力的举措，推动人力投入、物力配置、财力保障转移到乡村振兴上来，全面推进产业、人才、文化、生态、组织“五个振兴”。

　　产业振兴是乡村振兴的重中之重。目前，各地乡村产业都有了一定基础，有些地方新产业新业态发展势头很红火。但是，总体看来，乡村产业发展还处于初级阶段，规模小、布局散、链条短，品种、品质、品牌水平都还比较低。要适应城乡居民消费需求，做好“土特产”文章，向开发农业多种功能、挖掘乡村多元价值要效益，向一二三产业融合发展要效益，推动乡村产业发展壮大。另外，发展乡村产业，还要通过全产业链拓展产业增值增效空间，强龙头、补链条、兴业态、树品牌，增强市场竞争力和可持续发展能力，让农民分享更多产业增值收益。

　　农村是亿万农民的家园。未来我国城镇化将达到很高水平，但仍会有几亿人在农村就业生活。建设宜居宜业和美乡村是农业强国的题中应有之义，必须加快实现乡村由表及里、形神兼备的全面提升。让农民更好享受现代文明生活，要继续把公共基础设施建设的重点放在农村，短板要加快补上。要在推进城乡基本公共服务均等化上持续发力，注重加强普惠性、兜底性、基础性民生建设。同时，要完善党组织领导的自治、法治、德治相结合的乡村治理体系，让农村既充满活力又稳定有序。

　　做好农业农村工作，说一千道一万，农民增收是关键。巩固拓展脱贫攻坚成果是全面推进乡村振兴的底线任务。要继续压紧压实责任，把脱贫人口和脱贫地区的帮扶政策衔接好、措施落到位，加强动态监测帮扶。要坚持把增加农民收入作为“三农”工作的中心任务，培育提升产业，增强群众技能，积极扩大就业，千方百计拓宽农民增收致富渠道。

　　乡村振兴，关键在人、关键在干。如今，脱贫攻坚的成就已载入史册，全面推进乡村振兴的新蓝图已经绘就。新征程上，我们要乘势而上、接续奋斗，汇聚更强大的力量全面推进乡村振兴，让希望的田野更加充满希望，为全面建设社会主义现代化国家开好局起好步提供有力支撑。（常钦）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.